One of the main income sources available to musicians is producing music for others. Music production services could include mixing, mastering, recording, composition, beat making, and arranging. As a freelancer, it could be difficult to find demand for your services and that is where online platforms come in.

There are a number of online platforms that can help you find demand for music production services. Some are built specifically for music services and others are less focused but still useful for musicians. Some of the top platforms include SoundBetter, Fiverr, and Upwork. In this article we will take a close look at those and several others.

1. SoundBetter

Overview: SoundBetter is a specialized platform dedicated to music professionals, connecting artists with producers, mixers, and session musicians.

Pros:

Cons:

SoundBetter is great for serious producers wanting to connect with musicians. Since the platform is built specifically for the music niche, unlike other more general freelance websites on this list, it has many features that are very helpful for selling music services. You can include high-quality samples and display credits from productions you have been a part of to enhance your profile’s attractiveness. You can also easily sell pre-recorded music with a variety of licensing options and sell consultations to those who are just looking for professional feedback on their music.

2. Fiverr

Pros:

Overview: Fiverr is one of the most popular freelance marketplaces where you can offer your music production services. With a user-friendly interface and a broad audience, it’s an excellent place to start.

Cons:

Fiverr is one of the dominant platforms in the freelancer space. With Fiverr you get a high traffic platform but also high competition. There is likely also a lot of low cost competition for your niche. You get an extremely good website with fantastic user experience for the buyers and sellers. But you also pay high commissions as a seller and a buyer.

3. Upwork

Overview: Upwork is another freelance platform that caters to a wide array of professionals, not just musicians. It allows you to bid on jobs that match your skills as well as list your own freelancer profile for buyers to find.

Pros:

Cons:

Upwork can be a solid choice for those willing to invest time in bidding and building a reputation. Fees are not as bad as other platforms and the site has very good web traffic. But, in several ways, the user experience is not as well suited for music services as other platforms.

4. AirGigs

Overview: AirGigs focuses on connecting musicians with freelancers offering production services, from mixing and mastering to composing and arranging.

Pros:

Cons:

While the user base may be smaller, the quality of buyers on the platform can be high and it could be easier to stand out on this platform vs more popular ones with more sellers.

5. Bark

Overview: Bark is a marketplace for services, including music services, where service providers pay to contact leads and handle payment outside of the platform.

Pros:

Cons:

Bark can be a good choice for producers who want to receive direct leads. However, it’s crucial to have strong sales ability to convert leads into clients.

6. Contra

Overview: Contra is a freelance marketplace that does not take any commission from sellers. Instead they take a flat fee from buyers.

Pros:

Cons:

Contra charges no fees to the seller and a low flat fee to buyers. Contra charges $19 to buyers to start a project with a freelancer and $19/mo for ongoing projects (as of September 2024). Since most other sites do not charge anything to buyers, there maybe be fewer buyers on Contra but those who do contact you are likely to be better clients.

7. Freelancer.com

Overview: Freelancer.com is a global freelancing platform where you can bid on various projects, including music production tasks. It is a less popular version of Upwork with only 10% of the web traffic of Upwork.com.

Pros:

Cons:

Freelancer.com can be a mixed bag; while it offers many opportunities, the competitive nature means you’ll need to put extra effort into your bids to stand out. On the other hand, it is one of the higher traffic freelancer websites.

8. Guru.com

Overview: Guru.com is less popular version of Upwork with only 1-2% of the traffic that Upwork.com gets.

Pros:

Cons:

Guru.com may not be the best platform for music services, but that could also mean that there is less competition for the music related jobs on the site.

Music Producer Platform Cost Comparison Table

The cost structured outlined in this table were recorded on September 29, 2024. Numbers given here are correct but the overall cost structures of each of these platforms are often very nuanced and require a far more detail to explain thoroughly. This table serves only to give you a crude idea.

PlatformCost
Contra$19 buyer flat fee to buyer; no fee for seller
Barksellers pay flat fees to contact leads
Soundbetter7% taken from the seller
Guru9% taken from the seller
Upwork10% taken from the seller
Freelancer.com10% taken from the seller; 3% taken from the buyer
Airgigs10%-15% taken from the seller
Fiverr20% taken from the seller, 5% taken from the buyer

Traffic Comparison Table

Data in this table was collected from SimilarWeb.com on September 29th, 2024.

PlatformMonthly Website Visits
Fiverr.com50,100,000
Upwork42,440,000
Freelancer.com5,984,000
Bark3,878,000
Guru.com853,400
Contra800,000
Soundbetter.com550,000
Airgigs116,422

Conclusion

The two dominant players in freelance platforms for music producers are Fiverr and SoundBetter. Fiverr is 100 times more popular but has far higher fees and is not music focused. Soundbetter has far less traffic but it is the dominant music focused freelance platform. Because of the music focus, SoundBetter has amazing features that are specific to the music services niche and the buyers on the website are all music service buyers. It is hard to know how much of the traffic on Fiverr is composed of music service buyers. And when you consider that, SoundBetter and Fiverr may actually have comparable traffic from website visitors looking for music related services.

By John Filippone